Cincinnati v. Ilg (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The city of Cincinnati appeals from a judgment of the First District Court of Appeals that affirmed a trial court order to exclude evidence obtained from an Intoxilyzer 8000 breath-analyzer machine as a sanction for the failure to comply with a discovery order directing the Ohio Department of Health (“ODH”) to provide Daniel Ilg with its computerized online breath archives data, also known as “COBRA data,” consisting of information transmitted by the machine to ODH for each breath test it performed.
{¶ 2} In accordance with R.C. 4511.19(D)(1)(b), ODH approved the Intoxilyzer 8000 as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. VegaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. TannerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Columbus v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HelkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Columbus v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cleveland v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. TurneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. SchmidtOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.