Legal Opinion
Todd v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 13, 1982No. 64537PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence and for driving after being declared a habitual violator. Held:
1. In two enumerations defendant asserts that his conviction for driving after being declared a habitual violator should be reversed on constitutional grounds because he did not have counsel when he was convicted of the offenses upon which his habitual violator status was based. He relies on Baldasar v. Illinois, 446 U. S. 222 (100 SC 1585, 64 LE2d 169).
This issue has been decided adversely to defendant in Smith v. State, 248 Ga. 828 (3), 831…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Love v. HardisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Jennings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989