Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1950No. Civ. No. 17762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

On June 10, 1949, petitioner commenced an action in the respondent court against Mary E. Dillon to recover money due him in the amount of $2,501. On October 1, 1949, an amendment to section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure became effective whereby the jurisdiction of the municipal court was increased to include actions involving $3,000. When said cause came on for trial on April 3, 1950, the trial judge of his own motion transferred it to the municipal court upon the ground that respondent court did not have jurisdiction to try the same by reason of the amount involved.

*438By the instant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berg v. TraegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People v. Allied Architects Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Architectural Tile Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Wheaton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Willen v. BoggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API