Legal Opinion
Said v. Eddy
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided January 28, 2000No. A99-0482-CV(HRH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLLAND, District Judge.
The court is ready to dispose of the remaining issue in this case, whether plaintiff can maintain a declaratory action pursuant to subsection 1503(a) of Title 8, of the United States Code.
Petitioner/plaintiff is Hawa Said. Respondents/defendants are Robert Eddy, District Director of the United States Immigration & Naturalization Service, Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, and Janet Reno, United States Attorney General.
Plaintiff is a young female who is a resident of Alaska. She was born in the Arab Republic of Yemen in 1978.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hanover Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Agosto v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rios-Valenzuela v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Ortega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Henry v. QuarantilloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Headley-Ombler v. HolderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Angie Ortega v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.