Legal Opinion
United Automobile Insurance Company v. Christensen
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 6, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02269Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 United Automobile Insurance Company, Case No.: 2:18-cv-02269-JAD-BNW 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Order Re: Motions to Supplement and for Reconsideration 6 Thomas Christensen, E. Breen Arntz, and Gary Lewis, [ECF Nos. 41, 49] 7 Defendants 8 9 Last September, I denied Thomas Christensen’s special motion to dismiss United 10 Automobile Insurance Company’s (UAIC’s) barratry claim under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statutes 11 because he didn’t meet his evidentiary burden.1 Christensen now asks me to reconsider that 12 ruling2 to take into account the Nevada…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Thompson v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Brown v. Kinross Gold, U.S.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2005
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Coker v. SassoneNevada Supreme Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.