Legal Opinion

Evans Marketing Agency v. Federated Fruit & Vegetable Growers Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1930No. 7159PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) After a review of the- record in this case, we are of the opinion that the court erred in overruling certain of the demurrers to the equitable amendment filed by the claimant, Fruit Growers Inc., and to the intervention filed by the Credit Corporation. From the amendment filed in aid.of the claim it appears that the claim was based upon a contract, a copy of which was attached to the amendment; that Hale, the defendant in execution, applied to the Credit Corporation for money and supplies with which to make a peach crop for the season of 1928, and executed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Gregg & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Haas v. Old National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Burt v. RubleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Thompson & Son v. Waterman & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Parker & Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smeltzer v. Bank of FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Rucker v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API