Matter of Reinstatement of Floyd
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
The petitioner was disbarred in 1981 and in June of 1988 he petitioned for reinstatement. A trial panel of the Professional Responsibility Tribunal held a hearing on the petition and found: (1) that the petitioner possesses good moral character; (2) that there is no evidence that the petitioner had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law; (3) that the petitioner possesses the competency in learning required for admission; (4) that his present state of health is compatible with the practice of law; (5) that the petitioner’s past problems with Bar complaints were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SamaraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Matter of Reinstatement of EliasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Matter of Reinstatement of EssmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
3Cited by23 opinions
- Matter of Reinstatement of SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- In Re the Reinstatement of CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF RICKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GILLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- In re the Reinstatement of SwantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.