Legal Opinion

Matter of Reinstatement of Floyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 30, 1989No. SCBD 3518PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

The petitioner was disbarred in 1981 and in June of 1988 he petitioned for reinstatement. A trial panel of the Professional Responsibility Tribunal held a hearing on the petition and found: (1) that the petitioner possesses good moral character; (2) that there is no evidence that the petitioner had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law; (3) that the petitioner possesses the competency in learning required for admission; (4) that his present state of health is compatible with the practice of law; (5) that the petitioner’s past problems with Bar complaints were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SamaraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Matter of Reinstatement of EliasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Matter of Reinstatement of EssmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. In Re the Reinstatement of CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF RICKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  4. IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GILLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. In re the Reinstatement of SwantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API