Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Feit
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1951Published
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
The City of New York moves for an order pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice, striking out the two answers of the defendant, Bertha Feit, and awarding summary judgment to the plaintiff, and for a further order granting judgment to the city on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112.
This is an action in rem to foreclose unpaid tax liens pursuant to the provisions of title D of chapter 17 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (L. 1948, ch. 411, eff. July 1,1948) affecting section 14 of the Tax Map of the County of Kings. As required by said statute, this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keely v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Levy v. . NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Village of Charlotte v. . KeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.