Legal Opinion

Auto Credit of Nashville v. Melissa Wimmer - Dissenting

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 31, 2006No. M2005-00978-COA-R3-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 18, 2005 Session AUTO CREDIT OF NASHVILLE v. MELISSA WIMMER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 23298-C C. L. Rogers, Judge No. M2005-00978-COA-R3-CV - Filed on August 31, 2006 FRANK G. CLEMENT , JR., J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Auto Credit failed to give Ms. Wimmer reasonable notice of the scheduled sale of the collateral. The Uniform Commercial Code provides that a person “notifies” or “gives” a notice or notification to another “by taking such steps as may be reasonably…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mallicoat v. Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  2. In Re Estate of DaughrityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API