Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Bangs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Evidence. Account. Assignment. Bankrupt. New trial. Before Judge Herschel V. Johnson. Washington Superior Court. March Term, 1874. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

Gilmore employed Bangs to conduct a mercantile business for one year, at an agreed salary of, $700 00. Bangs entered on the performance of his undertaking and served about a month, and Gilmore discharged him. After the expiration of the year, Bangs brought this suit for his salary, and recovered the whole amount, less what he had received, on account. A new trial was moved for' and refused. Before the trial, the declaration was amended by introducing the names of two persons, husband and wife, the son-in-law and the daughter of plaintiff, as usees; and the action proceeded in…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rivers v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Griffin v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Graham v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API