Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Meyers

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1896No. 1,672PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The appellee was employed by the appellant, as an agent to solicit life insurance. This action was brought by appellee, before a justice of the peace, to recover what is denominated special salary. In the justice’s court the appellee recovered $68.17. The cause was appealed to the superior court, where a jury trial was had, and a- verdict returned for $53.17, for which judgment was rendered.

The contract declared upon provides that the agent shall receive, as his salary, 15 per cent, of the amount of the collections each week, and a “special salary of fifteen times the net increase of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Home Insurance v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Byrne v. Rising Sun InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Clark v. ChamberlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Protection Insurance v. PhersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Hooser v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1959
  4. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Overby v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API