Legal Opinion
Farmers Fire Insurance v. Brighton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 5, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff Farmers Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter Farmers) is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendant Carl Brighton, doing business as Rivers Edge Tavern, with respect to an action based on the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101) commenced against the defendant Brighton by the defendants Huffnagle, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated August 10, 1987, which (1) denied its motion for summary judgment and, upon searching the record, granted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Allstate Insurance v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Foremost Insurance Co. v. RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ward v. Corbally, Gartland & RappleyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SciricaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. PersaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- U.S. Liability Insurance v. Staten Island HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Blee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.