Legal Opinion

South Florida Farms Co. v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 16, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The declaration is in the statutory form. The plea is not guilty. Verdict and judgment were for defendant. Plaintiff took writ of error and assigns as errors the court’s order overruling its motion for a new trial and entering judgment in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff, so far as this record discloses, is owner of the premises. Defendant is in possession under an executory contract to .purchase same from the plaintiff. Upon the trial plaintiff sought to prove that there had been such a breach of the contract to purchase by defendant as to entitle it to rescind…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cilabot v. Winter Park Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Felt v. MorseSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Talley v. Kingfisher Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Norris v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Brixen v. JorgensenUtah Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henry v. EckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Consolidated Land Co. v. TylerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Nelms v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Latin-American Bank v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Wismer v. AlyeaSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API