Haizen v. Yellow Cab Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
ENGLISH, J,
dissenting:
I must dissent for a number of reasons.
This court’s opinion reverses the trial court’s judgment (and the jury’s verdict) as to damages, because the majority have become convinced — presumably by the manifest weight of the evidence — that the damages awarded were inadequate. For this court thus to have considered and weighed the evidence, a proper record of the testimony must first have been presented. This was not done.
Rule 1 of this court (the same, in substance, as Rule 36 of the Supreme Court) provides for preserving evidence questions by the filing of a report of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paul Harris Furniture Co. v. MorseIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Charles E. Harding Co. v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Elmhurst v. KegerreisIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- McCottrell v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Romines v. Illinois Motor Freight, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.