Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was convicted of armed home invasion, G. L. c. 265, § 18C; armed assault with intent to murder, G. L. c. 265, § 18 (b)\ and unlawful possession of a firearm, G. L. c. 269, § 10 (a). The Appeals Court affirmed the convictions. See Commonwealth v. Smith, 75 Mass. App. Ct. 196 (2009). We thereafter granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review, limited to issues relevant to the indictment for and conviction of armed home invasion. We now affirm the conviction, although we do not agree with all of the reasoning of the Appeals Court.

The relevant facts are set forth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. DoucetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. RuizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. CollardoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. BurtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. InoaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API