Legal Opinion
Clark v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided November 24, 1989No. 87-CV-1094PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, District Judge.
Susan and Robert Clark commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of Susan Clark’s mother’s alleged ingestion of dieth-ystilbestrol (“DES”) in 1954, while pregnant with Susan. Susan Clark claims that her in útero exposure to DES caused her to suffer various physical injuries. Her husband, Robert Clark, contends that because of the physical injuries which Susan has sustained he has been deprived of his wife’s love, companionship, society, consortium, and other services. Defendants E.R. Squibb & Sons,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rademacher v. TorbensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Briggs v. Julia L. Butterfield Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mehtani v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Miller v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Walsh v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re New York County Des LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Adams v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Murphy v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1989