Goldberg v. Penny
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages based upon fraud, implied breach of contract and the theory of quasi contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), entered August 22, 1988, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Larry Penny and the Town of East Hampton which was to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action as asserted against them and which denied the plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the complaint and to serve a notice of claim nunc pro tunc.
*353Ordered that the order and judgment is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tango v. TulevechNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bradkin v. LevertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Parsa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zimmer v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- PHL Variable Ins. Co. v. Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Infrastructure Management Systems v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Verifacts Group, Inc. v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Lujan Home Builders, Inc. v. Town of OrangetownNew York Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.