Legal Opinion

Shorr v. Marwill Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the appellants are not entitled to the relief sought. This does not mean, however, that we are of the opinion that the conduct of the referee is above criticism. A referee occupies a position similar to that of a judge, and it is essential that litigants have implicit confidence in his impartiality. There is seldom any obligation on the part of a member of the bar to act as referee when designated by the court. When he has agreed to act he must conduct himself throughout the proceeding in a manner that will not cast any reflection upon the administration of justice.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. Klein ex rel. Klein's Outlet, Inc. v. Klein's Outlet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. National Bank of North America v. New Paltz Growers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. People ex rel. New York Central Railroad v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API