Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chaleunphonh v. Parks & Recreation Division

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1996No. 16293Published

1Dissent

DISSENT

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

18. I respectfully dissent. As the briefs describe the lease arrangement between the United States and the State of New Mexico, the federal government has retained responsibility for management and maintenance of all the physical facilities within the Elephant Butte Reservoir area which could constitute “works” as the term is used in the Tort Claims Act. Plaintiffs assert, and the Defendants do not disagree, that State employees are not engaged in operation or maintenance of the “works.” State employees are exclusively employed to operate and maintain the facilities…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saiz Ex Rel. Estate of Saiz v. Belen School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Allocca ex rel. Allocca v. New Mexico Department of Energy Minerals & Natural ResourcesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API