Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Huffman

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 18, 1992No. ACMR 9101876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of one specification of conspiracy to obstruct justice, one specification of willful disobedience of a commissioned officer, three specifications of signing false official documents, three specifications of wrongful appropriation, one specification of adultery, one specification of assault consummated by a battery, two specifications of assault, and two specifications of communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 81, 90, 107,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HuffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. RollinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. WattsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. FolkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API