Dooley v. Bohannon
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The attack upon the judgment of non-
suit is based upon two contentions: (1) That the evidence made a case of excessive levy. (2) That the evidence showed that the sheriff’s sale was not advertised as required by law. It is con tended that for these reasons the sale was void, and that the sheriff’s deed did not divest the plaintiff of title.
To determine whether or not the levy was excessive it is first necessary to find what property was sold. The tax execution was against the plaintiff for taxes due by her to the State and county for the year 1920. Neither the execution nor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brooks v. RooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Conley v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Keeter v. Bank of EllijaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Lee & Bradshaw v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bracewell v. MortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Coleman v. DurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Townsend v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Campion v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Bracewell v. MortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.