Ioannides v. Romagosa

Dr. Tim Ioannides appeals a final judgment entered in favor of Dr. Ricardo Ro-magosa after a jury found him liable for both breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment on the fraudulent inducement claim because any alleged fraudulent oral representations that he made to Dr. Ro-magosa regarding his earnings were adequately addressed in a written employment agreement subsequently executed by the parties. We agree that the contract *432between the parties precluded relief on the fraud claim and reverse.

Dr. Ioannides…