Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court’s order affirming the clerk’s taxation of costs and awarding costs to the Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK, 2010 WL 2509904 (W.D.N.C. June 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and…
3Cited by8 opinions
- CMDS Residential, LLC v. Mayor and City Council Of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- H.H. Franchising Systems, Inc. v. RoboDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- HARBOR BUSINESS COMPLIANCE CORPORATION v. FIRSTBASE.IO, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC v. S&J Auto1 LCCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
- Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. CruceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.