Legal Opinion · Dissent

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Pamela Ciccone, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 24, 2016No. SC13-2415Published

1DissentPolston, J.

The majority creates a totally different legal definition of “manifestation” to then rulé that plaintiffs whose cause of action had not yet accrued at the time of Engle3 class certification are part of the class. This newly created “manifestation” cannot be found in Engle and is contraiy to Florida law governing creeping disease cases such as this one. As a result, we have two different meanings of the exact same word: (i) the meaning ascribed by the majority for the purpose of determining whether a plaintiff is a member of the Engle class; and (ii) the meaning commonly used, to determine…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API