Legal Opinion

Parker v. Wheeler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1933No. 826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GUERNSEY, J.

•For the relief which the defendant Rockey asks as against the plaintiff, he relies upon the following equitable principle:

“The equitable remedy on marshaling securities, with that of marshaling assets, depends upon the principle that a person having two funds to satisfy his demands shall not, by his election, disappoint a party hav - ing but one fund. The general rule is, that if one creditor, by virtue of a lien or interest, can resort to two funds, and another to one of them only, — as, for example, where a mortgagee holds a prior mortgage on two parcels of land, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. SnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Homan, Assignee v. MichlesOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Toledo Blank, Inc. v. Pioneer Steel Service Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API