Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Thrall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1973Published

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

In the first trial of this ease the trial court held the defendants had no interest in the property under a claimed lease option agreement and awarded plaintiffs judgment for rent and restitution of the premises. On appeal we held the defendants did have a contract interest; however, they were in default. Adamson v. Thrall, 262 Or 408, 498 P2d 379 (1972). We remanded the case for entry of an appropriate decree of foreclosure. Thereafter, defendants filed a supplemental answer. They alleged plaintiffs were not entitled to foreclosure because they did not come into court with clean hands; that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adamson v. ThrallOregon Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API