Legal Opinion
Matter of Boardwalk Amusement Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.
The city of New York resolved to acquire by condemnation property owned in part by the respondent. A proceeding instituted to that end was discontinued pursuant to section 992 of the charter of the city. (Laws of 1901, ch. 466, amd. by L.. 1915, ch. 606.) It is by that section provided: “ But in case of such discontinuance the reasonable actual cash disbursements, necessarily incurred and made in good faith by any party interested, shall be paid by the city of New York, after the same shall have been taxed * * An attorney retained by the respondent had represented it in the discontinued…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Matter of Buccini v. Paterno Const. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Carolina Public Service Authority v. WeeksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Vastola v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942