Legal Opinion

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 3, 2008No. Nos. 03-2622C, 04-33CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JOINDER

WHEELER, Judge.

In these spent nuclear fuel cases, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“ConEd”) and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC (“Entergy”) have claims arising from the Department of Energy’s breach of contract at the Indian Point 2 Nuclear Power Station (“Indian Point 2”) in Buchanan, New York. ConEd sold Indian Point 2 to Entergy on September 6, 2001. Before the Court is Defendant’s June 2, 2008 motion under Rule 19(a) of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) to join the claims of ConEd and Entergy for trial and decision.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sindia Expedition, Inc. v. Wrecked & Abandoned VesselCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States v. The Cherokee NationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. A. J. Kellos Construction Co. v. Balboa InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1980
  4. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API