Legal Opinion
People v. Weinberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), imposed March 31, 1993, which, after a hearing upon remittitur, fixed the amount of restitution.
Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we discern no improvident exercise of the court’s broad discretion in controlling the scope of cross-examination so as to prevent extensive inquiry into irrelevant or collateral areas (see, e.g., People v McGriff, 201 AD2d 672). Moreover, the court properly limited the scope of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. McGriffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. HodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. EmmiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. MagrigorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. ThorpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.