Legal Opinion

Vines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 18, 2011No. 1D11-0361Published

1Per curiam

Michael Vines appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel on six grounds. We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s denial of grounds 2, 5 and 6. But we reverse the denial of grounds 1, 3 and 4 because the court erroneously relied on defense counsel’s affidavit to refute Vines’s claims. See Morris v. State, 624 So.2d 864, 865 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“[A]ffidavits generally cannot substitute for live testimony, subject to cross-examination, in proceedings under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.”); Robinson v. State, 516 So.2d 20, 20…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Penn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Morris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API