Morissey v. People
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Recorder’s Court of Detroit. A sufficient statement of the facts will be found in the opinion of Justice Manning.
1Opinion of the Court
Manning J.:
The plaintiffs in error were convicted of larceny on an information charging the larceny to have been committed in tbe city of Detroit. On tbe trial it appeared the articles mentioned in the information were taken from a store that was broken open on tbe night of tbe 19th of November, 1860, at Windsor, on tbe opposite side of tbe Detroit River, in Canada, and were brought over tbe river to tbe city.
On the trial tbe evidence to prove these facts was objected to, on two grounds: 1st, That tbe information did not charge the larceny to have been committed in Canada; and, 2d, That tbe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. McKinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Tyler v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Shannon v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- People v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Norris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. ZabijakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. MarchMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Detzur v. B. Stroh Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. QuiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. WilletteMontana Supreme Court · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.