Legal Opinion

Claim of Kleinsak v. R.B. Samuels, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 8, 2003, which ruled that claimant was barred from receiving further workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 29.

Claimant was injured in 1987 while working, and eventually was found to have suffered a permanent total industrial disability and received workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant also commenced a third-party action. When it reached the top of the trial calendar, claimant’s attorney concluded that the third-party action should not go to trial and the case was marked off the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DeRosa v. PetrylakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Claim of Duffy v. G. A. Fuller Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Claim of Ostolski v. C. M. H. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. Claim of Donnelly v. United Bus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Maher v. State University CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Djukanovic v. Metropolitan Cleaning LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Matter of Salvia v. Nutritional Frontiers LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. Safi v. New York City Department of EmploymentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API