Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Federal Natl. Mort.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 13, 2010No. Civil Action No. 1998-0617Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE FITTS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 98-00617 (HHK) UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Jane Fitts and defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) have reached a settlement agreement calling for the Court to determine the amount of reasonable attorneys’ fees to which Fitts is entitled. Before the Court is Fitts’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs [#211]. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition thereto, the declarations and other submissions in support of both…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API