Legal Opinion

American Savings Bank Co. v. Union Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1931No. 22790PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

It was stated by counsel in oral argument that the form of entry of appointment of receivers, and their general authority as such, is a stock or standard printed form utilized by the courts of Cuyahoga county whenever a receiver is appointed.

There is a clear distinction, it seems to us, between the express and implied authority conferred upon operating receivers of railroads or industrial establishments and a receiver who is merely appointed to take charge of property and collect rents, as in this case. This distinction is recognized in Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. v. Central Rd. Co. of N. J., 35…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. O'brien, Treas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Gotham King Fee Owner, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API