American Savings Bank Co. v. Union Trust Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
It was stated by counsel in oral argument that the form of entry of appointment of receivers, and their general authority as such, is a stock or standard printed form utilized by the courts of Cuyahoga county whenever a receiver is appointed.
There is a clear distinction, it seems to us, between the express and implied authority conferred upon operating receivers of railroads or industrial establishments and a receiver who is merely appointed to take charge of property and collect rents, as in this case. This distinction is recognized in Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. v. Central Rd. Co. of N. J., 35…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bernhard v. O'brien, Treas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Gotham King Fee Owner, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013