Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. v. Blanchard Motor Co.

PER OUBIAM.

The record iu this case contains what purports to be a copy of the petition and answer filed by defendant, E. E. Hopkins, 'but these purported copies do not show that they were ever filed in the office of the clerk or ever became part of the record in the case. The record recites that application was made for judgment against E. E. Hopkins for want of a sufficient answer, which the court overruled, but there is no application in the record and no order of the court overruling same. The record recites that the other defendants demurred to the petition, which the court overruled, but…