Legal Opinion

Magrane v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 20, 1904PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from. St. Charles Circuit Court. — No». E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) The court erred in giving instruction 1 asked by plaintiff. Said instruction is erroneous: (a) Because it imposes upon defendant too high a degree of care in the operation of its cars. Jackson v. Railroad, 118 Mo. 224; Jacquin v. Cable Co., 57 Mo. App. 320; Hite v. Railroad, 130 Mo. 132. (b) Because it is based upon the theory that plaintiff was injured by the collision of the ears.

Read the full summary

Appeal from. St. Charles Circuit Court. — No». E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) The court erred in giving instruction 1 asked by plaintiff. Said instruction is erroneous: (a) Because it imposes upon defendant too high a degree of care in the operation of its cars. Jackson v. Railroad, 118 Mo. 224; Jacquin v. Cable Co., 57 Mo. App. 320; Hite v. Railroad, 130 Mo. 132. (b) Because it is based upon the theory that plaintiff was injured by the collision of the ears. Peary v. Railroad, 162 Mo. 75; Chitty v. Railroad,-148 Mo. 64; McManamee v. Railroad, 135 Mo. 440; Waldheir v. Railroad, 71 Mo. 314; McCarty…

1Opinion of the CourtValliant, J.

The defendant owns and operates a system of street railroads in the city of St. Louis and the county of St. Louis.

On September 7, 1900, a collision occurred between two cars of .defendant that were running on the same track, each in the opposite direction to the other. The plaintiff was a passenger on one of the cars and received personal injuries in the collision; that is, he was not on the car at the instant it came in actual collision with the other, hut when the danger of a collision was imminent, there was a panic rush of the people on the car to escape, and the plaintiff standing on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Malloy v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Price v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Casey v. Wrought Iron Bridge Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Moore v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Meade v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. McCardle v. George B. Peck Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API