Legal Opinion

Williamson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 31, 2010No. 1D09-3801PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The appellant, Monterrance Williamson, seeks review of the trial court’s order of probation. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in revoking his probation for a curfew violation. We agree and reverse.

After pleading guilty to aggravated battery, the sentencing court placed the appellant on probation for a period of five years with a curfew for the first 12 months. In its oral pronouncement the sentencing court stated, “The curfew will begin one hour after you complete work and go through one hour prior to you attending work subject to any modification deemed necessary by your…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Odom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Page v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Burgin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Hutchinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. James Arlie Tyson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Person v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Randolph Alex Lawhorn v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Tyson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API