Legal Opinion

Nickel v. Nickel

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1967No. Docket 880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-regor, J.

Plaintiff-husband, a physician, brought this suit for divorce on the grounds .of extreme cruelty. The defendant-wife, a biochemist, filed a counterclaim, seeking separate maintenance on the same grounds. After approximately 15 days of hearing, the trial court dismissed both actions .because it found that neither party was so free .of fault as to be entitled to relief. Godfrey v. Godfrey (1956), 347 Mich 130. Defendant appeals the dismissal of her counterclaim.

It is unnecessary to relate the myriad allegations and counter-allegations of extreme cruelty. It is sufficient to state that upon a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sovereign v. SovereignMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Boter v. BoterMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Gundry v. GundryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Godfrey v. GodfreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Kirstein v. KirsteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nickel v. NickelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Riha v. RihaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API