Legal Opinion
Carl v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 1978No. 50591PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
The Admissions Board of the College of Medicine of the University of Oklahoma selects the students who will be admitted to the College of Medicine. The Admissions Board’s meetings and all aspects of its selection processes are closed to the public.
R. B. Carl, M.D., a member of the Admissions Board, commenced proceedings to enjoin the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma (appellee) from allowing the Admissions Board to meet in closed sessions, alleging that the Admissions Board was subject to the then existing “Open Meeting Law”, 25 O.S.1971, § 201. 1 The State of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Town of Palm Beach v. GradisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Arkansas Gazette Company v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- IDS Properties, Inc. v. Town of Palm BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Sanders v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- BD. OF TRUSTEES v. Miss. Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 2479 v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Kenai Peninsula Borough v. State, Department of Community & Regional AffairsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.