Legal Opinion

Lunger v. Hinckley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 1991No. 90-3040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We sua sponte strike Betty Lunger as a named respondent.

The respondent concedes error. We grant the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition and quash the order of the trial court on the authority of Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Murphy v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swezy v. Bart-SwezyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004