Legal Opinion
Silano v. Carosella
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 2, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover in this action of contract for board and room furnished to the defendant, and for board, room and clothing furnished to his daughter. A general finding was made for the plaintiff by the trial judge.
The reported evidence tended to show that the plaintiff and defendant were kinsmen, and that in 1922, after the death of his wife, the defendant at his own request came to live with the plaintiff with the latter’s assent, and continued so to live until the defendant remarried in December, 1927. In 1923 the defendant brought his minor child, then twenty-two months old,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Cooper v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Doherty's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Williams v. Pittsfield Lime & Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Livingston v. HammondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richards v. ForrestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Kelly v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Silversmith v. SydemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Griffin v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Burns v. SawyerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.