Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1977No. 1366, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

What is the denial of the right to a speedy trial? As Professor Anthony G. Amsterdam, a recognized champion of defendants’ rights, has pointed out, * 1 it is not one thing but many things. What represents an inordinate delay within the contemplation of the Sixth Amendment, therefore, depends upon precisely what it is that the defendant seeks when he asserts a “speedy trial” claim. It is one thing when he demands, “I have a right to a speedy trial; therefore, try me immediately.” It is yet another when he demands, “I have a right to a speedy trial; therefore, release me upon my recognizance if…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hughey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Hines v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Robert M. Wilson v. Charles Fenton, Warden, U.S.N.E.P., and the State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Brady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API