Cabaniss v. City of Tuscaloosa

There is no merit in the insistence that the alleged confessions of the defendant were improperly admitted, or in the contention that the court committed reversible error in admitting in evidence the alleged inculpatory statements made in the presence of the accused, and to which he vouchsafed no reply. As to the alleged confessions, the predicate for their introduction met every requirement of the rule and were sufficient. And-, so far as the inculpatory statements made in the presence and hearing of defendant are concerned, there was no infraction of the rule applicable to evidence of this…