Legal Opinion

ATM Four, L. L. C. v. Ramos

Nassau County District Court

Decided June 7, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Margaret C. Reilly, J.

In view of the recent amendment of the Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations, the Court hereby vacates its earlier decision, sua sponte, and replaces it with the instant amended version.

The petitioner instituted this summary holdover proceeding against the respondent, seeking to recover possession of real property located at 27 Attorney Street, apartment 1L, Hemp-*311stead, New York, alleging that the respondent failed to timely renew her lease, pursuant to Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations (9 NYCRR [ETPR]) § 2503.5. A hearing was held, at which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Eastern Pork Products Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Evans v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Carriage House Realty Co. v. ConlonYonkers City Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Soon KwonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. ATM Two, L. L. C. v. RamosNassau County District Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API