Legal Opinion

Paul v. Luigi's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 1997No. 96-86PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

Plaintiff Jesse Paul was injured while investigating a suspicious vehicle in an alley behind defendant restaurant, Luigi’s, Inc. (Luigi’s). Luigi’s claims that Paul is barred from recovering any damages based on the fireman’s rule [hereinafter referred to as the firefighter’s rule]. Following a trial, the district court granted judgment in Paul’s favor. We affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Paul is a police officer in Oelwein, Iowa. At approximately 3:30 a.m. on April 29, 1993, Paul was dispatched to investigate the presence of a suspicious vehicle parked in a dark…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pottebaum v. HindsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Lave v. NeumannNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Frunzar v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Rennenger v. Pacesetter Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Koenig v. KoenigSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Sheets v. Ritt, Ritt & Ritt, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Richardson v. Commodore, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. In Re the Estate of Vazquez v. HepnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. McKernan v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API