Rodriguez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICKHOFF, Justice.
Isidro Rodriguez was convicted of aggravated sexual assault; after a jury trial he was sentenced to 60 years in prison and fined $10,000. In two points of error Rodriguez contends the state’s argument at punishment was so egregious that he was denied a fair trial, and that his appointed counsel was ineffective at the punishment phase of his trial. We affirm.
Jury Argument
In his first point of error Rodriguez complains that the state’s closing argument was so prejudicial as to deprive him of a fair trial. The argument complained of follows:
But you are all smart people.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cockrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Breeanna Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Jaubert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Jaubert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Jaubert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Jaubert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.