Legal Opinion

Rial v. Curtis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1954No. 12774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMBLEN, Justice.

This is a damage suit arising out of & collision between an automobile driven by the appellant Rial, and the appellee Curtis, a pedestrian. The trial in the District Court of Harris County was before a jury, which, in response to special issues submitted, found the appellant Rial negligent on seven counts, each proximately causing the collision and resulting damages. The jury acquitted the appellee of negligence on each of the grounds alleged by the appellants, and found that the collision was not the result of an unavoidable accident. Damages were assessed by the jury in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GasscampTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Psimenos v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hoey v. SoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Stehling v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Howsley v. GilliamTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Arambula v. J. M. Dellinger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Gillock v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API