Legal Opinion

Nolting v. Petersen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1966No. 32310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages resulting from a fall down a common stairway in defendants’ office building. Jury trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $7,500.00. The trial court sustained the defendants’ motion for new trial specifying the two grounds upon which it based its ruling. We have herein determined that the first of these assigned reasons properly supports the trial court’s action and thus we need not rule upon the other. Accordingly, we will set out in this opinion only the facts that bear upon the contention defendants…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Venditti v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Venditti v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Woodworth v. Kansas City Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Gray v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Duncan v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gathright v. PendegraftSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Gilbert v. K.T.I., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Menschik v. Heartland Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Sansone v. LondeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API