Legal Opinion

Seivers v. Dickover

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1885No. 11,844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Laporte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, C. J.

The evidence establishes, or at least tends to establish, the following state of facts: On and prior to the 17th day of August, 1881, Thomas Garland was the owner of a stock of boots and shoes, book accounts, etc., of the value of $2,880. At that time he was indebted to appellees, except Dickover, much in excess of the value of the goods and accounts, and had no other property. On that day, for the purpose of defrauding his creditors, some of whom were the appellees, except Dickover, he sold and transferred the goods and accounts to appellant for $1,000. Appellant became the purchaser with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bales v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Thompson v. EagletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Arnold v. DirrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Smith v. SelzIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Roberts v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Bunch v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API