Legal Opinion
Miller v. Nix
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 24, 1994No. 93-687PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Tony Miller appeals from a directed verdict in favor of the appellee, Manuel Nix. The Trial Court granted the directed verdict after finding Mr. Miller had failed to prove his damages on his tort claim at trial. Mr. Miller contends that was error. He also asserts error in two evidentiary rulings made by the Trial Court. We affirm the directed verdict.
During the early morning of May 15, 1989, Tony Miller was driving to work through a rural area of Nevada County. It was dark and foggy, and as he approached the point at which the highway passed land owned by Mr. Nix, his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John C. Hull v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Mankey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Boykin v. Mr. Tidy Car Wash, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Smackover State Bank v. OswaltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Gist v. Meredith Marine Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Mahan v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Cottrell v. CottrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Thompson v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995